politics

Presidential Campaign Polling Comes To Second Life

Gravel Polling Center in Second Life When former Senator Mike Gravel opened his campaign headquarters in Second Life last May he became the first U.S. presidential candidate to officially authorize a presence in world. Despite the fact that the 2008 presidential race is becoming something of a watershed event for the social web, there's no indication that any of the other candidates have an interest in using SL, or any other virtual world, to reach voters. That hasn't stopped the Gravel campaign from expanding its efforts in SL.

Gravel is now taking his SL campaign to a new level, using his virtual headquarters as a launching pad for one of the most important strategic tools in any campaign -- polling. On the surface this may not seem newsworthy -- other political groups are already conducting polls in SL. The difference here is that the Gravel poll in SL represents the official campaign's ONLY polling effort ... anywhere. The Mike Gravel 2008 National Polling Center is located in Second Life.

I stopped by the Gravel headquarters to examine the new polling system and find out what sort of information the campaign hopes to gain from polling residents of a virtual world. In world campaign director Astrophysicist McCallister (also a real-world Gravel campaign staffer) demonstrated the new system for me, and answered questions about its strategic value.

The system is fairly rudimentary at this point. Residents are asked to choose a candidate from a list of Republicans and Democrats, indicate why they chose the candidate, and indicate what state they're from. The state information will be used to segment responses and filter out non-US residents.

To call this a minimalist approach to polling would be an understatement. However, I'm told that in the future the system will be expanded to gather more data.

I asked McCallister what sort of information the campaign hoped to gain from polling residents of a virtual world -- after all, a survey of this sort gathers almost no meaningful demographic data about respondents. It's hardly a scientific approach to polling.

McCallister indicated the system will allow the campaign to "generalize data of Second Life residents. The goal in mind, however, is to gauge Second Life residents living in, and hopefully registered to vote in, the United States". Given the relatively small number of U.S. residents active in Second Life I expect the poll will produce what statisticians might refer to as a "small sample size". Still, McCallister tells me that the the real world campaign will process and use the data in some manner, "the intent and purpose is almost singularly RL. The National campaign is taking the data, after we process it, and analyzing it mostly as they would any other poll".

Of course, this whole approach comes down to money -- or rather, a lack of money. The political process, in the U.S. at least, is driven entirely by money. While new media provides candidates with low cost exposure to a national audience, professional polling is still expensive. Gravel is apparently intent on exploring other options, no matter how unconventional they may seem.

This whole approach to polling makes more sense when you consider the candidate. Other campaigns (the ones that can afford more scientific polls) frequently use polling data to determine what issues their candidate should be talking about, and even what opinions their candidate should have on certain issues. Gravel isn't that sort of candidate. He already knows what his issues are, and it's unlikely that poll results are going to sway him or have an impact on his stump speeches.

McCallister does concede that the SL poll is just a first step and that the campaign will likely expand its efforts to include other avenues -- most likely the web. But for now, the campaign is focusing on gathering data in Second Life.

Yahoo Says: Pay No Attention To Our Actions

Tagged:

*** UPDATE 07/12/2007: Looks like Ars Technica had the same thought. ***

Check out the lastest from the AP wire:

HONG KONG (AP) -- China should not punish people for expressing their political views on the Internet, Yahoo Inc. said Monday, a day after the mother of a Chinese reporter announced she was suing the U.S. company for helping officials imprison her son.

Yahoo criticized China in a brief statement that didn't specifically mention the case of jailed journalist Shi Tao, whose mother visited Hong Kong on Sunday. Shi was sentenced to 10 years in 2005 after sending an e-mail about Chinese media restrictions.

The company has acknowledged sharing information about Shi with Chinese authorities.

"Yahoo is dismayed that citizens in China have been imprisoned for expressing their political views on the Internet," the company said in the statement faxed to The Associated Press, which asked Yahoo to comment on Shi's lawsuit.

Well... so... so you say that sucks, but you're still playing ball with them. Hmm.

I don't mean to belittle Yahoo's move here. It's huge that they came forward with a statement like this. Good for them!

Still, does this mean that they won't be, oh I don't know... handing China ammunition to jail anybody who expresses a point of view? They're not actually saying that, are they? No, they're just saying that freedom is good... and then quietly crushing it.

I mean, we'll see. Let's give them a chance. This might be a sign of things to come. Either that, or it's a total shell game to get the public to forget that Yahoo would sell them out in a heartbeat.

The Broadly Offensive

Tagged:

Big bad article over at the Herald right now about a new movement. Here's the comment I posted:

*** BEGIN ARTICLE SUMMARY ***

Sorry it's just this is soooo much text, and I thought it might be handy to sum it up:

The Abuse Report system, as it stands right now, does more harm than good. Ultimately, the thought here is that the only use for the current Abuse Report system is for griefing. The proposal is to get out of the habit of using it and find other ways of dealing with our troubles. This has the dual benefits of:
A) allowing the residents, rather than Lindens, to decide which policies are valid and which aren't.
B) keeping personal conflicts personal.

If you're interested in showing your support for this notion you can join "The Broadly Offensive" group, whose slogan is "Do Good by Doing Jack". Well ok, that was my suggestion... not really sure if they took me up on that or if they're just laughing at me. I think both. Anyhow...

Most of the rest of these comments are arguments about that because arguing is a great way to show that you can form sentences out of words. Your call on whether or not that accomplishes anything. My opinion is most likely clearly implied.

That's it.

*** END ARTICLE SUMMARY ***

Mike Gravel - Rock

Tagged:

So this guy... he's running for President. Really.


If you think America needs ... less talking ... and less dry rocks ... vote for him. I guess.

What?

Syndicate content